Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winchester commission split over compensation study; motion to rescind fails
Summary
Commissioners clashed over a compensation study that restructured pay grades; a motion to rescind personnel orders brought by Commissioner (Speaker 8) citing inequities failed after the mayor and others defended the market adjustments for employees.
A lengthy debate over a recently adopted compensation study and associated personnel orders dominated the latter portion of the meeting. Commissioner (Speaker 8) moved to rescind the personnel order and argued that the study produced uneven results — saying many employees received very small adjustments while a small number of recent hires received large raises, which he singled out as problematic. He cited examples discussed in the packet, including a roughly 19.6% increase for the city manager and a 36.8% increase for the human resources director.
Commissioner (Speaker 8) said the open records process used by a commissioner to review the study raised concerns and asked the commission to ensure that everyone received at least a 1% minimum adjustment. In a forceful moment the commissioner said the claim that everyone received 1% was incorrect and described that assertion as "100% a lie." The record shows his motion to rescind the order and call for revisiting the study.
Mayor Reese and other commissioners pushed back, saying the study was intended as a market correction to bring city positions to competitive rates and that departments are absorbing the adjustments within existing budgets. Mayor Reese said, "I am not gonna tell any employee in the city of Winchester that I'm voting to take back what we just gave them," and declined to support rescinding raises already issued. Other commissioners and department heads described the study process, noting market comparisons, department‑head review of job assignments and a multi‑party approach to setting grades.
The commission recorded a vote on the rescind motion; the motion failed and the personnel orders remained in effect. Several commissioners asked staff to revisit elements of the study and to provide more detailed documentation; multiple council members indicated they want further review of calculations and the treatment of very recent hires. The meeting closed with no rollback of the personnel orders recorded.
