Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Library topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Study shows broad support for a new Yankton library; concerns about parking and cost remain

Yankton City Commission · August 12, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Julia Helwig of the University of South Dakota presented a library feasibility study showing 1,425 respondents and roughly 84% overall support for constructing a new library; 65% said they would probably or definitely accept a temporary property-tax increase to fund it, though respondents repeatedly raised parking, accessibility and cost concerns.

Dr. Julia Helwig, principal investigator with the Government Research Bureau at the University of South Dakota, told the Yankton City Commission that a community needs assessment found widespread support for a new library but persistent concerns about parking, accessibility and cost.

Helwig said the bureau collected 1,425 survey responses—about 8% of the county’s adult population—and conducted multiple focus groups. "We ended up with 1,425 respondents," she said, and reported a survey margin of error of about ±2.5 percentage points.

The most direct measures of support in the survey showed 84% of respondents were at least somewhat supportive of constructing a new library. When asked specifically whether they would support a temporary property-tax increase (an opt-out) to fund a new library, Helwig reported about 65% answered "probably" or "definitely" yes.

The study also identified recurring operational problems at the current facility: limited parking (Helwig reported counting 27 parking spaces at the existing site), cramped staff and storage areas, accessibility and restroom shortcomings, and outdated technology. Staff spaces behind the public areas lack air conditioning in some places, she said, and focus groups emphasized the need for flexible layouts, separate quiet and noisy zones and better accommodations for children, older patrons and people with mobility challenges.

Helwig framed the findings in the context of best practices: flexible, safe spaces and expanded technology are common recommendations. She also noted a degree of "cognitive dissonance" among residents—many want a newer, larger facility but are also concerned about the taxes required to pay for it.

Copies of the final report and a short public summary were made available to the commission and the public; Helwig said a fuller public presentation will be scheduled at the library. The presentation packet includes a QR code linking to the report.

The commission did not take any vote on library construction at the meeting; the study was presented for commission review and public awareness.