Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Portal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public urges clearer portal and access to comments as Norwalk commission reviews minutes and website
Summary
At the Charter Vision Commission's Dec. 17 meeting, public commenter Lisa Ritten pressed commissioners for a more visible public portal and fuller online access to written comments; commissioners agreed to verify postings, locate prior commission submissions and test recent website fixes.
Lisa Ritten, 19 Shorefront Park and independent party town chair, urged the Charter Vision Commission on Dec. 17 to create "a more visible and accessible public portal" so residents can view and submit written comments on charter revision topics. "A published agenda with abbreviated minutes is insufficient," Ritten said, adding that three-minute public-comment periods and the way minutes have been summarized leave the public without adequate access to community input.
Chair (unnamed) acknowledged the concern and said the issue had been raised before. "If it's not out there, it's something that we can correct, and we'll work to correct," the chair said, denying any instruction from the city to truncate or hide information. The chair also said he had received Heather Dunn's comments by email and would follow up with staff to ensure documents are posted and linked prominently.
Commissioners debated whether prior public submissions from the previous Charter Revision Commission had been preserved in full or only summarized in an internal grid used by staff and consultants. Commissioner John (commissioner) and others asked to review the entire text of prior comments rather than summaries; the chair said he would try to locate and circulate what is preserved as public record.
Consultant/staff member Steve Mednick said he could see a working comment-submission form on the commission web page in real time and encouraged members to test the site. One commissioner reported earlier that a suggestion button went to a page saying "this form is currently not accepting responses," while Mednick reported the form was functioning when he checked. Mednick described the tracking grid as noting whether a commenter supported a four-year term or other options, but said the grid did not attempt to summarize the full substance of each written submission.
The commission agreed to table approval of the Dec. 3 minutes until members can confirm whether written submissions such as Heather Dunn's were received and posted correctly. Chair asked members to try the website between meetings, circulate suggested fixes and copy the full commission so staff can gather a consolidated list of needed improvements. The commission did not take a final vote on minute content at the Dec. 17 meeting.
What happens next: Chair will follow up with city staff to verify posting and circulation of written comments (including Heather Dunn's letter), commissioners will test the public submission form and the approval of Dec. 3 minutes was deferred to the next meeting.
