Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing And Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brookings council adopts amended reasonable-accommodations procedure after residents press for enforcement
Summary
After multiple residents urged enforcement over an alleged rental zoning violation at 312 Eighth Avenue, the council adopted an amended ordinance establishing a procedure for reasonable-accommodation requests under federal fair-housing law and set a special meeting to complete the ordinance reading and possible final action.
Get email alerts on the Housing And Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brookings City Council advanced and amended an ordinance to establish a formal procedure for reasonable-accommodation requests under the Fair Housing Amendments Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, after an extended public-hearing exchange in which residents pressed the city to enforce an alleged zoning violation.
City Attorney Steve Britzman told council staff recommended approval of the ordinance to provide an application-and-hearing process for individuals seeking reasonable accommodations. Britzman said the city previously lacked a codified procedure and that adoption would allow a fair, prompt hearing and defined timelines.
Several residents used the public-comment period to press the council on enforcement of an alleged longstanding zoning violation at 312 Eighth Avenue, saying they had raised the issue with council and staff multiple times. Resident Kara Bianchi Rossi asked the council to "direct the city attorney and take action" and questioned whether the city was "picking and choosing" which landlords to penalize. Molly Richter, another resident, said: "What is the point of having ordinances if you're not gonna enforce them?" Both speakers urged immediate action rather than waiting for ordinance adoption.
Britzman responded that the city has enforcement remedies available in city code and under state law but that enforcement steps had been suspended because the property owner or occupant had submitted a reasonable-accommodation request; he explained that the ordinance establishes how the city will process such requests, including an application requirement and a hearing schedule. Council discussion focused on procedural clarifications: under the amended language, an applicant should submit materials at least 15 days before a scheduled hearing, and staff increased the required notice radius for hearings to 250 feet.
Councilmembers voted to adopt the amendment and then approved a motion to schedule the next reading/hearing at the earliest lawful date. After discussion of the five-day notice rule for amended ordinances, council agreed to hold the next meeting on Monday the thirtieth (the earliest feasible date under the rules discussed) to complete the ordinance process.
What happens next: the council scheduled the follow-up meeting to complete the ordinance reading and any additional action once public notice and procedural timing are satisfied.

