Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Safe Streets resolution debated but no motion; discussion to continue after grant work
Summary
Commissioners discussed a Safe Streets for All grant and a resolution committing to goals (50% reduction in serious crashes by 2030; zero deaths by 2040) and reviewed study timelines, but dissent and concerns about scope led to no motion and the item died for lack of a motion.
Commissioner Baggett presented a resolution on March 17 tied to the Safe Streets for All grant that would set a county goal of reducing the crash rate of traffic‑related deaths and serious injuries by 50% on county‑maintained roads by 2030 and work toward zero traffic‑related deaths and serious injuries by 2040. Baggett said the county has completed stakeholder outreach and a safety action plan draft is due June 15, 2025 with completion targeted for Aug. 15 and final adoption in October.
Staff described the grant as a federal/state award (approximately $160,400 in the engineering/study phase with an in‑kind match) and said that completing the study is required to make the county eligible for a later construction grant. Commissioners and staff discussed the practical implications, who would perform the work (traffic engineering firm Kimley Horn was referenced), possible grant conditions and the time commitment by staff.
Several commissioners expressed concern about federal grant strings, resource allocation, and the workload required to manage the grant. One commissioner said the county already faces competing priorities (roads, jail, landfill, hospital obligations) and declined to make a motion. After extended remarks and back‑and‑forth, no motion was made and the resolution died for lack of a motion.
Why it matters The Safe Streets grant funds a traffic‑safety study whose recommendations could be used to apply for construction funding. If advanced and funded, recommended projects could alter county road designs, intersection treatments, and SPLOST priorities.
Next steps Staff will continue stakeholder work on the safety action plan per grant requirements; commissioners did not adopt the resolution on March 17 and may revisit the matter when the board determines whether to pursue the construction phase.
