Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning Moose Mountain topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board accepts Moose Mountain site-plan application for study after applicant warns of lost revenue and missing conditional-use listings
Summary
The Brookfield Planning Board accepted Moose Mountain LLC's site-plan application as complete for study after the applicant warned the town that removal of conditional-use listings and unclear procedures have disrupted operations and risked closure; the board will hold a site visit and public hearing before a final decision.
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning Moose Mountain topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brookfield Planning Board voted to accept the Moose Mountain LLC site-plan application as complete and will review it in detail at its next meeting, schedule an on-site inspection and hold a public hearing, after an applicant representative urged the board to allow time to resolve procedural confusion that has blocked events and cost the business income.
The applicant, speaking for Moose Mountain and affiliated entities, told the board that conditional-use listings and subcommittee minutes referenced in earlier town votes appear to be missing from the current zoning text, leaving event approvals and site-plan procedures unclear. "At this point, it's submitted under duress, but I'm doing it in a good faith effort to work with the town," the representative said, asking the board not to allow enforcement action that would close the restaurant while parties reorganize.
Why it matters: The application covers a proposed full-service restaurant with outside alcohol and a longer list of future uses the applicant says it wants to preserve (weddings, outdoor events, a movie theater, caretaker dwellings and recreational activities). Board members and staff told the applicant that, under Brookfield's current zoning, anything not explicitly listed as a permitted use is treated as a conditional use and therefore may require review; they also said a site-plan review is required for the restaurant proposal.
Board response and process: Planning-board members urged the applicant to narrow the application to the core restaurant request to speed review, but also acknowledged they can accept a broad submission for study and accept supplemental materials later. A member moved to accept the application as complete for study at the next planning-board meeting; the motion was seconded and passed by voice vote. Board staff said the next steps will include a detailed planning-board review, an on-site inspection and a public hearing (board members discussed aiming for a public hearing roughly 10 days after required public-notice periods) with a possible planning-board action on Nov. 12.
Disagreement and enforcement: The applicant said the town's recent removal of a separate "non-permitted" list and the absence of conditional-use text has the practical effect of making many activities "prohibited" or at least procedurally difficult to permit. The applicant estimated roughly $100,000 in lost revenue from delayed approvals and warned that a Selectmen-issued cease-and-desist or enforcement action could threaten operations. Board members said the planning board can recommend that the Selectmen rescind an enforcement order but does not itself rescind Selectmen enforcement actions; they urged the applicant to raise enforcement-relief questions with the Selectmen, who were expected to consider enforcement at an upcoming meeting.
What was decided: The planning board accepted the Moose Mountain site-plan application as complete for study and set the process in motion: staff and members will conduct a detailed review, schedule an on-site inspection and hold a public hearing before any final determination. Several board members encouraged the applicant to provide clearer maps and a narrowed scope (for example, identifying the precise location for an outdoor movie area or a second caretaker dwelling) to reduce time spent on technical definitions at future hearings.
Next steps and timeline: The board said it will review the application fully at its next planning meeting, perform an on-site visit, and arrange a public hearing after proper notice; members discussed targeting a planning action on Nov. 12 for the restaurant if the applicant supplies required details and public notice timelines are met.
The planning board closed public comment and returned submitted materials to the applicants; further discussion and any enforcement-relief recommendations will involve the Selectmen at their next meeting.

