Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Manor Grocery Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manor Planning commissioners recommend denying rezoning that would allow gas pumps at historic Manor Grocery
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended denial of a rezoning that would have allowed Manor Grocery to apply for a gas station permit, citing traffic, parking and downtown character concerns. The owner’s agent said major fuel suppliers require at least three pumps.
Get email alerts on the Manor Grocery Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Manor Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously Dec. 11 to recommend denying a rezoning request that would have allowed Manor Grocery to seek approval for gas pumps at the downtown corner of East Parsons and Lexington streets.
Staff explained the request would change three lots from Downtown Business (DB) to Light Commercial (C1), which would permit the owner to apply for a specific‑use permit for a gas station. Christian Garcia, agent for the property owner, said the team wants to “reopen Manor Grocery with the gas station” and that major suppliers such as Shell and Valero require at least three pumps for a supply contract.
Commissioners raised multiple concerns about safety, circulation and the character of downtown. “I don’t see 6 pumps solving that problem on these two lots,” said a commissioner who cited the tight site footprint and frequent truck traffic at the intersection. Commissioners noted several existing gas stations within a mile of the site, limited on‑site parking, and difficulty turning in and out of the corner. Several members urged adaptive reuse that would preserve the grocery’s historic facade and create pedestrian‑oriented amenities instead of intensifying fueling operations.
Staff reminded the commission that the property lost a nonconforming right to operate pumps after the fueling use was inactive for more than 90 days; the rezoning request was therefore the route proposed to allow a future fuel operation. Commissioners asked for more detailed site information, including curb‑cut and truck‑service plans, but moved to act without the applicant present.
Commissioner Leonard made the motion to recommend denial; Commissioner Pies seconded. The commission recorded a unanimous vote to deny the rezoning recommendation. The staff record and applicant materials show the proposal included removing a rear metal building, extending the store footprint, and installing a canopy and pumps; the applicant said the canopy would be roughly 25 by 75 feet and that suppliers expect three pumps to qualify for service.
Next steps: the Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendation will be included in the record for any subsequent city council consideration. The owner and agent were advised to return with more detailed drawings and traffic/ingress‑egress plans if they pursue the request again.

