Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recording Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Huntington Township adopts recording-devices policy after public privacy concerns
Summary
After extended public comment about privacy and editing, the Huntington Township Board of Supervisors on July 11 adopted a written policy specifying where and how recording devices may be used during public meetings under the Sunshine Act.
The Huntington Township Board of Supervisors voted July 11 to adopt a recording-devices resolution that sets where and how residents may record public meetings. Todd (Solicitor, Speaker 10) told the board the draft frames permissible devices, designates an information-table location as the default position for non-handheld equipment, and restricts supplemental lighting and concealed recording.
The move followed extended public comment raising civil-rights and privacy questions. A resident (Speaker 8) said the policy should not allow what she described as "retaliatory" recordings and asked whether edits to posted meeting videos would alter the public record. Another attendee (Speaker 12) asked if the board's own audio recording of minutes would be covered by the policy.
Todd responded that the policy does not ban videotaping; it designates placement and seeks to prevent devices from blocking seating or distracting participants. Chair (Speaker 1) said the rules clarify expectations after a prior meeting when the chair asked an operator to move a camera. "We're not saying in any way you cannot videotape," Chair (Speaker 1) said during the discussion.
The policy bars concealed recording, prohibits audio devices that project sound into the room, forbids supplemental lighting for video, and requires operators to remain in a single location during proceedings unless the chair grants permission. The board approved the resolution by voice vote; the policy will take effect at the next meeting.
Board members and attendees disagreed in tone and emphasis during the discussion; several residents urged the solicitor to check civil-rights implications. The board said the solicitor drafted the rules after reviewing sample ordinances from other municipalities and framed them under the Sunshine Act. The board recorded the vote by voice; no roll-call tally was taken.
The policy's text and effective date will be available with meeting materials at the township office and in the meeting packet for the next public meeting.
