Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance And Opm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hallowell committee backs expanded oversight, urges OPM hire and filling vacancies
Summary
The committee voted a positive recommendation on a draft resolution expanding its oversight of the multi‑generational center, urged the council to fill vacancies, and recommended hiring an owner's project manager to oversee construction and protect taxpayer dollars.
The Hallowell Review Committee on Oct. 24 voted to recommend a draft resolution that would broaden its charge to oversee design and construction of the town's proposed multi‑generational center and to report regularly to the town council.
Councillor Osher (Speaker 5) presented the draft resolution, saying it would expand membership, add two non‑voting alternates and make the committee the "first and readily accessible line of communication" between the design team and town council while reserving all monetary decisions to the council. "The HRC shall be responsible for overseeing the multi generational center construction and improvement project and prepare recommendations and advice for action by the council, which, however, shall be non binding on the council," Speaker 5 said.
Members debated whether to rename the body to reflect construction work ("building committee") or keep the Hallowell Review Committee title; Speaker 5 and others emphasized that the substance of the resolution (expanded scope and oversight functions) mattered more than the name. Committee members also urged continuing outreach to advisory groups that had advocated for a senior center, saying those groups should be invited to participate in design discussions.
The committee also discussed procurement and oversight. Several members cautioned against using the phrase "design build," with Speaker 1 saying the project will proceed under a design‑bid‑build model with separate design and construction teams. Members recommended defining what constitutes a "major decision" to avoid future disputes over authority.
On construction oversight, members recommended engaging an owner's project manager (OPM) to provide on‑site representation, track budgets and review change orders. "Every public project that I have worked on has an owner's project manager and they're the third party that protects the town," Speaker 1 said, recommending the committee advise the council to engage OPM services; the committee gave that recommendation by voice vote.
The committee also moved to urge the town council to expeditiously fill current committee vacancies so new members may participate in the design and oversight process.
What comes next: The committee will forward the draft resolution and its recommendations (including the BH+ A contract and the OPM suggestion) to the town council for its Nov. 18 agenda. Staff and committee members will refine resolution language to add clarity (definitions of "major decisions," membership terms, and contract oversight procedures).
