Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Counsel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Smithfield council votes to retain Vincent F. Ragosta for police-union litigation
Summary
The town council voted to retain attorney Vincent F. Ragosta to represent North Smithfield in International Brotherhood of Police Officers v. Town of Noosphere after discussing the matter under Rhode Island law governing executive sessions for litigation.
The North Smithfield Town Council voted to retain attorney Vincent F. Ragosta to represent the town in litigation brought by the International Brotherhood of Police Officers.
Madam President introduced the agenda item under Rhode Island General Law 40-2-46 (sessions pertaining to collective bargaining or litigation), noting the case listed as International Brotherhood of Police Officers v. Town of Noosphere (case number given during the meeting). An unidentified councilor moved that the town retain the services of Vincent F. Ragosta, attorney at law, and the motion was seconded. The council took the motion to a roll-call vote, and members recorded affirmative responses, approving the retention.
Why it matters: retaining outside counsel signals the town intends to use specialized legal representation in a union-related dispute rather than relying solely on in-house counsel. The council discussed the item following an executive-session discussion of litigation matters and formally approved hiring Ragosta by roll call.
What happened next: the council recorded the roll-call vote as part of the public session and then proceeded to other agenda items. No contract amount, scope of representation, or effective dates were stated during the on-the-record discussion.
