Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Elections office readies for Nov. 5 general election; one judge excluded pending complaint

Maverick County Commissioner's Court · September 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The court approved temporary election workers, the order and notice of the Nov. 5 election, early-voting sites and pay provisions, but removed one early-voting judge from the approved list while the Secretary of State reviews a formal complaint; the court directed elections staff to follow up with SOS.

Maverick County Commissioners Court on Sept. 9 advanced multiple actions to ready the county for the Nov. 5 general election, approving temporary hires, early-voting and election-day judge lists and pay for training and tabulator operators.

The court approved hiring temporary election workers at $12 per hour and authorized election-office overtime/comp time arrangements needed for election operations. It also approved the order and notice of election and the list of early-voting and election-day judges and clerks. The court approved pay for certain mandatory training and for tabulator operators for the election.

One procedural exception: the court excluded a single named individual from the approved judges list after the county Democratic chair submitted a formal complaint about that individual. Judge Espanto asked the elections office to coordinate with the Secretary of State and to keep the court informed; the court agreed the name would remain off lists until SOS guidance and the formal review process concluded.

Direct quote: "For purposes of the complaint, I'd ask for that to remain confidential until it's formally reviewed by the Secretary of State," Judge Espanto said.

Why it matters: The actions complete many operational steps for the upcoming general election and reflect the court’s deference to the Secretary of State process when complaints about election workers arise.