Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate Bill 497: parks lodging procurement exemption fails to clear committee

AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - SENATE · March 30, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 497, sponsored by Senator Bart Hester, would exempt state park lodging supplies from lowest-bid procurement rules so parks could select higher-quality vendors. Jeff King of State Parks said parks rely on cash operations (about $31.7 million last year) and that the change would let them compete with private hotels; some senators raised sole-source concerns and the do-pass motion did not receive enough votes.

Senate Bill 497, offered by Senator Bart Hester, would remove certain procurement restrictions for lodging facilities at state parks so park managers could choose vendors based on quality rather than strictly taking the lowest bid.

"We operate basically with our cash revenues," Jeff King, deputy director of the Division of State Parks, told the committee. "Last year we garnered about $31,700,000 in cash operations. About 50% of that comes from overnight lodging operations." King said those revenues are reinvested in park operations and that flexibility in procurement would let parks provide higher-quality guest experiences and better compete with private hospitality providers.

Committee members expressed concern the change could lead to sole-source arrangements and to picking "winners and losers" if exemptions were written too broadly. King said the parks envision using requests for proposals and multiple contracts to identify the "most advantageous proposal," not a single sole-source award.

A motion to give SB 497 a do-pass recommendation was made and seconded, but after limited discussion the chair indicated the committee did not have enough votes to carry the motion and no do-pass recommendation was recorded in the transcript.

Next steps: SB 497 did not advance in this committee meeting. The transcript records the operational rationale and fiscal figures but no committee approval.