Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Flood Damage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

University preliminary estimate: June floods affected ~800,000 acres, $206M baseline damage

Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development - Senate · July 1, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The University of Arkansas presented a preliminary assessment attributing roughly 800,000 acres affected by June storms and a baseline economic damage estimate of about $206 million (range $227M–$257M when including additional losses). Estimates will be refined as federal and state data arrive.

Dr. John Anderson, representing the University of Arkansas agricultural economics team, told the joint committee that preliminary satellite and crop‑overlay analysis shows roughly 800,000 acres were affected by the June heavy‑rain event in parts of Southeast Arkansas, with just over 500,000 acres experiencing six inches or more of standing water for multiple days.

Using conservative baseline assumptions, Anderson said the team’s headline estimate of economic damage — focused on major row crops — is about $206,000,000. He provided a crop breakdown the team used for the baseline: roughly $60 million for corn, about $6 million for cotton, just under $70 million for rice and about $70 million for soybeans, with roughly $1 million for wheat.

Anderson described methodological assumptions behind the figures: a 15% average production loss used for corn across ~360,000 acres (at an assumed market price of $5.95/bushel), a 10% rice yield loss on affected acres, and for soybeans an estimate that 25,000 acres were a total loss while another ~100,000 acres would be replanted late and carry an average 30% yield penalty. He said that this baseline omits some categories that are harder to quantify — infrastructure and equipment losses, levee failures, clogged drainage and increased harvest costs — and that including those unquantified losses could raise the estimate by 10%–25% (Anderson gave a range of about $227,000,000 to $257,000,000 as an upper bound with additional factors).

On insurance, Anderson said most farms have some crop‑insurance participation but many in Southeast Arkansas hold only catastrophic coverage (50% yield, 55% price), which provides limited protection for partial losses. He said the University will refine estimates as USDA and RMA data become available and offered to follow up with additional information for Farm Bureau and committee briefings.

Committee members asked about a federal disaster declaration; Anderson said he was not aware of a federal declaration at that time and said the congressional delegation was pursuing available options. He also warned that pre‑booked crop contracts and cash‑flow disruptions can produce long‑term financial hardship for individual producers even when aggregated headline values capture gross value lost.