Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Resources topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Antonio Water System explains aquifer storage, desalination and push for permit stability

Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development - Senate · October 31, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Greg Eckhart of San Antonio Water System described long‑term supply diversification after an endangered‑species lawsuit, outlined aquifer storage and recovery capacity (about 186,000 acre‑feet reported in testimony), desalination from the Wilcox aquifer, and urged long‑term groundwater permit stability.

Greg Eckhart, representing the San Antonio Water System (SAWS), told legislators that the Edwards Aquifer historically supplied most of San Antonio’s water and that a federal endangered‑species lawsuit in the 1990s forced the city to limit pumping and diversify supply.

Eckhart described SAWS as serving more than 2 million customers over more than 13,000 miles of water and wastewater pipe and said the utility expects to invest more than $2.5 billion in capital projects over the next five years. He outlined several major projects: an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) program that stores Edwards water in a sand aquifer for later use (SAWS reported roughly 186,000 acre‑feet in underground storage on a recent morning), a large recycled‑water pipeline serving industrial and irrigation customers and downtown river flows, and a reverse‑osmosis desalination plant drawing slightly brackish water from the Wilcox Aquifer.

Eckhart explained some regulatory constraints: groundwater in Texas is regulated differently from surface water and is often managed by local groundwater conservation districts; SAWS located wells and injection sites across county lines in part to address differing district rules. He said many water providers will seek long‑term permit stability from groundwater conservation districts so that utilities can justify large, multi‑year investments.

In questions, Eckhart described a "bottoms‑up" drought planning emphasis — local planning and collaborative solutions — defended the federal intervention of the 1990s as a catalyst for diversification, and said recycled water is widely used for irrigation and to sustain downtown flow but is not injected into the Edwards Aquifer. He also described substantial conservation gains: SAWS reduced per‑capita water use by about 50% over 30 years, he said.

Eckhart concluded by urging evidence‑based management and described SAWS’ public outreach and investments that he said set the city up for future growth.