Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves bill requiring public bodies to post meetings on websites or social media when they maintain them

STATE AGENCIES & GOVT'L AFFAIRS-SENATE · April 6, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 1823 would require entities that own or maintain a website or social media page to post meeting notices 48 hours in advance (2 hours for emergencies); sponsors said the obligation applies only if the entity maintains an online presence and existing media‑notice rules remain.

The Senate State Agencies & Governmental Affairs Committee approved House Bill 1823, a transparency measure that requires a governmental entity that maintains a website or social media page to post meeting notices at least 48 hours before a meeting and at least two hours before an emergency meeting.

Senator Clark Tucker, the sponsor on the Senate side, said the bill simply updates the public‑notice framework for the Internet age. ‘‘If you have a website or social media page and you're gonna have a meeting…you gotta publish it on your website or social media page 48 hours before the meeting,’’ Tucker said.

Committee members raised practical concerns for small towns that do not have dedicated staff to maintain a website or social account. Tucker pointed out the bill is limited to entities that ‘‘own or maintain a website or social media page’’ and does not create an obligation for bodies that lack an online presence. He also noted the underlying statute (and current practice) requires notice to the media and that failure to post could be litigated, but he said the bill does not create a separate criminal penalty.

Senators also discussed whether the statute should define ‘‘meeting’’; Tucker said this bill addresses official meetings of a governing body and that a separate bill discussed earlier addresses informal conversations among members.

After discussion the committee moved and passed the bill by voice vote; sponsors said the measure is intended to make notice more accessible to the public through modern channels rather than replace existing media‑notice obligations.