Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Filing Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Filing-fee cap measure fails 4–3 after senators debate fairness and party autonomy
Summary
A bill proposing statutory limits on party filing fees (bill 443) failed on a 4–3 roll call after senators debated whether caps would lower barriers to office or improperly regulate party practices; sponsor said high filing fees discourage ordinary candidates.
Senators debated a measure identified in committee as bill 443 that would place limits on party-imposed filing fees. Senator Kane (recorded as recognized by the chair) argued the current practice — with party filing fees for some offices as high as $7,500 — places an unreasonable financial barrier on candidates and reduces competition. "Dollars $7,500 for state senate is unreasonable," Kane said, urging the Legislature to consider statutory caps or a standard that would make it less costly to run.
Opponents pressed that regulating party fee structures may intrude on party autonomy and that existing avenues allow candidates to run as independents or seek other ballot-access routes. Senators exchanged examples from past sessions and court rulings, with some members noting prior litigation over ballot access and signature requirements.
After discussion the sponsor closed and requested a roll-call vote. The clerk read votes: Senator Flowers — Aye; Senator Hester — No; Senator King — Aye; Senator Crowell — No; Senator Payton — No; Senator Dodson — Yes; Senator Tucker — Yes. The clerk announced "4 yeas, 3 nays, does not pass." The measure therefore failed to advance out of committee on that roll call.
The committee adjourned following the roll call.
Vote tally: 4 yeas, 3 nays; measure failed. The record shows the sponsor closed and requested a roll-call; a second was recorded for the motion to pass.
