Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill to require serial numbers on duplicate ballots
Summary
A Senate committee advanced a bill to require serial numbers linking original and remade ballots, a change sponsors and election officials say would improve transparency and allow later verification during recounts; a voter-integrity group cited a local incident where unmarked ballots could not be tracked.
A Senate State Agencies & Governmental Affairs committee on an unspecified date voted to advance legislation that would require officials to place sequential serial numbers on both original and duplicate (remade) ballots so the two can be linked for later review.
Senator Steve Kroll (Senator, District 3) said the measure clarifies existing practice and adds explicit, sequential numbering to damaged ballots and their replacements to improve "ballot transparency." He told the committee the bill "has clear guidelines and sequence numbers for the damaged ballots" to make tracking easier.
Daniel Schultz, director of the State Election Commission, told the committee that current Arkansas law requires officials to write the word "duplicate" on remade ballots but does not require a serial number to link the duplicate to the original. "Right now, the only statutory requirement is that you write duplicate on the duplicate," Schultz said, and the bill would add a serial number to both pieces so officials could "go back and compare to confirm it was done correctly in the context of a recount or any further review." He said in most cases damaged ballots are handled in a central-count setting (for absentee ballots) rather than at precincts.
Clint Lancaster of the Arkansas Voter Integrity Initiative testified in favor, recounting a Crawford County primary where a set of absentee ballots were put into a DS200 tabulator without being marked as duplicates. "They did not mark them as duplicate and they did nothing to make them identifiable," Lancaster said, adding that the event made it impossible to track whether remade ballots were handled correctly.
Senator Kroll closed by asking the committee to recommend the bill "do pass." The motion was made and seconded and the committee advanced the bill by voice vote.
The committee record shows the bill received no recorded public opposition during the hearing; next steps are committee reporting and scheduling for floor consideration as required by chamber rules.
