Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redistricting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rep. David Whitaker offers 'vanilla' map prioritizing whole counties and compactness; members ask for detailed deviations online
Summary
Rep. David Whitaker presented HB1961, a 'vanilla' congressional map emphasizing compactness and holding counties intact; he said he would work with colleagues on deviations and county placement. Members requested staff post detailed deviation breakdowns online.
State Representative David Whitaker (House District 85) presented House Bill 1961 and described it as a ‘‘vanilla’’ map intended to provide a straightforward, compact baseline that keeps counties whole when possible. Whitaker said the map reflects feedback he has received during the process and that he aims to avoid ‘‘arms and tentacles’’ or other noncompact shapes.
Whitaker acknowledged that keeping counties intact can produce larger deviations in some districts and said he was open to reworking the plan to bring numbers into a more acceptable range. Multiple senators raised concerns that some districts in proposed maps already start ‘‘behind the curve’’ if population growth over the next decade is concentrated in certain regions; Whitaker said he would review those concerns and work with other sponsors to lower deviations where feasible.
Committee members also requested that sponsors authorize staff to publish the maps and accompanying deviation breakdowns online; the chair and sponsors said staff would post materials after sponsors grant permission. Whitaker received particular feedback about Madison County; he said he planned to explore ways to include Madison in the 3rd District while balancing population numbers.
No votes were taken. Sponsors and staff left the meeting with assignments to supply detailed spreadsheets and to continue revising maps based on committee comments.
