Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Religion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears plan to enshrine religious-freedom protections in state constitution; Family Council testifies

STATE AGENCIES & GOVT'L AFFAIRS-SENATE ยท March 30, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sponsors presented a proposed constitutional amendment to elevate religious-exercise protections to a strict-scrutiny standard; Jerry Cox of Family Council testified that the amendment would provide a durable tool against federal actions he said threaten faith-based organizations.

Little Rock โ€” The Senate committee heard a proposed constitutional amendment that would strengthen protections for the free exercise of religion in the Arkansas Constitution and require that any burden on religious exercise meet strict scrutiny.

Sponsors said the amendment's text would mirror the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) standard and place it in the constitution so future legislatures or agencies could not easily alter it. "The right to free exercise of religion is a fundamental right," Representative Gazzaway said during his legal remarks.

Jerry Cox, executive director of Family Council, testified in support, circulated a policy brief and a 10-item list of federal actions he said could threaten religious exercise (including possible reversals of federal religious-liberty guidance and health-policy protections). Cox argued that a constitutional amendment would give state attorneys a stronger basis to push back in litigation and would guide future policymaking. "Once we pass an amendment, it serves as a guide from then on for this body about policy," Cox said.

Committee members asked whether the amendment would duplicate existing protections (Article 2 and state RFRA) and whether elevating certain rights could create conflicts with other constitutional provisions. Senator Ballenger and other members urged careful drafting to avoid inadvertently undermining other parts of Article 2 and recommended lawyers review drafting before any referral. No vote was taken.