Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Elliott seeks outside study of Arkansas Department of Correction; DOC leadership cites audits and reforms
Summary
Senator Doris Elliott introduced a bipartisan bill to commission an outside study of the Arkansas Department of Correction; department and board leaders described multiple recent audits and reforms and urged clarity on scope and contracting before a study is ordered. No final committee vote occurred.
Get email alerts on the Corrections Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Doris Elliott presented a bipartisan bill to commission an independent study and assessment of the Arkansas Department of Correction, saying the goal is objective oversight to identify strengths and areas for improvement rather than fault‑finding. Elliott said she had conferred with the governor and the department but pursued a legislative study after two years of conversations.
Wendy Kelly, director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, and Betty Magnus, chair of the Arkansas Board of Corrections, told the committee the department already undergoes a variety of external reviews. Kelly listed American Correctional Association accreditation audits, a PricewaterhouseCoopers transformation review paid for by the state, a Council of State Governments review and work by Pew and other outside groups. She said many reforms—rehabilitation programming, restrictive‑housing changes and reentry initiatives—are already underway.
Magnus described board oversight and the compliance division’s investigative work, noting the board contracts with the University of Arkansas to assess programs and has internal investigators and auditors. Both witnesses said the board and department are open to additional scrutiny but requested clarity on the study’s scope, the contracting method and the intended deliverables.
Committee members raised practical questions about whether statutory authority already provides oversight, whether the legislature should delegate contracting to a subcommittee, and whether another external audit would duplicate recent reviews. One senator said the department’s prior audits covered administrative and management areas and asked what new information the bill would deliver. Elliot said the study would include an RFP and aim to provide objective, public reporting to leaders and an oversight subcommittee.
The committee did not take a final vote on the study bill during the session; members asked the sponsor to amend language on contracting and boilerplate to match current legislative practices and to return the matter for further consideration.
