Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Sovereignty topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Committee Approves House Bill 1957 to Limit Federal Enforcement; Passes 5-1
Summary
The Senate City, County & Local Affairs Committee adopted an amendment and voted to report House Bill 1957 'do pass' as amended by a recorded roll call that produced five affirmative votes and one negative. The bill, presented by Sen. Missy Irvin, frames itself as protecting state sovereignty and includes enforcement penalties for state officers who assist federal actions it deems conflicting with the Arkansas Constitution.
House Bill 1957, described by sponsor Sen. Missy Irvin as a measure to protect Arkansas's sovereignty, was approved by the Senate City, County & Local Affairs Committee after the panel adopted a short amendment and voted to report the bill 'do pass' as amended.
Sen. Missy Irvin (R–District 18) told the committee the bill "reflects that protection from federal overreach and, more importantly, secures the constitutional right of state sovereignty." She said the measure applies to federal laws beginning Jan. 1, 2021, removes certain historical references in prior drafts, and adds a definition of a "federal ban" referenced in section 1-6-103. Irvin said the bill provides that a state law-enforcement officer who violates the act "would be subject to losing their certification as a law enforcement agent," and that elected officials could face an unclassified misdemeanor in specified circumstances.
The committee first considered a short amendment that, according to Irvin, "adds cosponsors to this bill" and clarifies enforcement language related to the statutory definition of a federal ban. The amendment was adopted on a voice vote before debate on the underlying bill.
During extended questioning, Sen. Flowers pressed Irvin on who would decide when a federal statute, executive order, or agency directive conflicts with the Arkansas Constitution. "Don't courts normally determine and interpret the laws?" Flowers asked, expressing concern about leaving conflict determinations to officers in the field. Irvin responded that courts can and do interpret statutes and that the bill includes processes intended to provide guidance and protect due process, including decertification procedures for law-enforcement personnel.
After procedural motions to take immediate consideration, the committee moved to report the bill 'do pass' as amended. At Flowers's request a roll-call vote was recorded: Senator Flowers voted "No." Senators Clark, Flippo, Mark Johnson, Sullivan and Rice recorded "Aye." The chair announced "a vote of 5 for affirmation" and declared the bill passed by the committee.
The committee did not record additional details on implementation timelines in the hearing. With committee passage, the bill moves to the next legislative step prescribed by Senate rules for committee-reported measures.
