Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews a bundle of public‑health and licensing rule updates; most stand as reviewed
Summary
The committee reviewed multiple rule updates across agencies — including environmental officer authority, speech‑language pathology and audiology, home health expansion, hospice, massage therapy, interpreters, sanitarians and water‑operator licensing — and, in each case, accepted the rules as reviewed without objection.
The Senate Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee reviewed a series of administrative rule updates from state agencies and took no objections on multiple items.
Key items accepted as reviewed included:
• Pollution Control & Ecology Commission Rule 27: Department of Energy & Environment staff said the rule updates reflect legislative changes expanding environmental officers’ citation authority (including open burning and illegal dumps) and clarified that environmental officers are not law‑enforcement officers; the committee accepted the rule as reviewed.
• Board of Examiners for Speech‑Language Pathology and Audiology: Rule changes implementing fee waivers and continuing‑education updates were presented and accepted as reviewed.
• Home health agency rules and Act 817: Department of Health staff reviewed public comments and concluded current rules already complied with background‑check and expansion provisions; rule accepted as reviewed.
• Hospice rules: Language was added to align hospice rules with hospital rules and to incorporate the 'No Patient Left Alone' Act (Act 311); rule accepted as reviewed.
• Massage therapy rules: Updates implement licensure changes including fee waivers, automatic licensure for uniformed service members and apprenticeship testing under the Earn‑and‑Learn Act; ad hoc committees will continue study but the committee accepted current rule updates.
• Advisory Board for Interpreters, Sanitarians and Water Operator Licensing: Each package had no public comments and was accepted as reviewed.
Most rule items were technical or statutory implementations of recent acts; where the transcript recorded follow‑up questions (for example, on equipment caps or process details), DHS or the presenting agency said they would follow up with additional information as requested.
