Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tobacco Cessation Rule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee sends DHS tobacco-cessation Medicaid rule back for clarification on youth access and vaping
Summary
The Senate Public Health Committee voted to send back a DHS rule intended to align Medicaid provider manuals with recent statute changes on tobacco cessation after members raised concerns the rule's wording could limit counseling for youth and might not explicitly cover vaping.
The Senate Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee returned a Department of Human Services rule on Medicaid tobacco-cessation coverage for further revision after members raised concerns it could inadvertently limit access for children and might not explicitly include vaping.
At a review of DHS rule changes, Mark White, DHS chief of legislative and integrative affairs, said the proposed revisions were intended to update Medicaid provider manuals to reflect recent legislative changes and to expand access to tobacco-cessation products and counseling. "The point was for the children to have access to the cessation counseling," White said, summarizing DHS intent.
Committee members queried whether the rule limited child counseling only when a parent or guardian smokes; Senator Hickey and others flagged the language as potentially restrictive. Janet Mann, director of DMS, said vaping is not singled out in the manual but is interpreted as a form of smoking and therefore covered. "Vaping is not listed directly, but it is a form of smoking, so it would be covered," Mann said.
After extended discussion about whether the wording should be broadened to 'nicotine cessation' and whether the rule as written could prevent children who vape from receiving counseling, a member moved to send the rule back to DHS for clarification and correction. Committee members instructed DHS to consult agency lawyers about whether explicit vaping language can be added during the current promulgation process and to report back to the committee.
Why it matters: Committee members stressed they did not want the rule’s language to narrow access for youth seeking counseling. DHS agreed to check the rule text and to return with proposed wording or explain the needed process to make changes before the next review.
What’s next: DHS committed to follow up with staff and chairs on whether language can be changed now or whether a subsequent rule action is required. The committee will review the revised language when DHS returns the rule for consideration.
