Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environmental Monitoring topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Five‑year monitoring of Big Creek finds no drinking‑water exceedances; soil phosphorus rose in application fields

PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE AND LABOR COMMITTEE - SENATE · June 9, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A five‑year monitoring study presented to the committee found well nitrate increases below EPA drinking‑water limits, elevated soil phosphorus in some fields, and no clear evidence of slurry‑pond leakage based on chloride trends; presenters recommended continued site‑specific management and monitoring.

Andrew Champlaier of the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture summarized five years of water‑quality and soil monitoring conducted around a concentrated animal‑feeding operation in the Big Creek watershed.

Champlaier said researchers sampled upstream and downstream stream sites, wells near holding ponds, and fields that had received slurry applications. Soil testing showed plant‑available phosphorus increased in the two fields that received slurry over the monitoring period; one field that received only mineral fertilizer did not show the same increase.

Groundwater sampling near the holding ponds recorded a small rise in nitrate concentrations but values remained below the EPA drinking‑water standard of 10 parts per million. Champlaier said chloride concentrations—an inert tracer present in slurry—did not show trends consistent with pond leakage, which weighed against a hypothesis that slurry ponds were losing material to groundwater.

Flow‑adjusted stream concentrations showed modest downstream nitrate elevations compared with upstream but no clear rising trend during the monitoring interval. Champlaier emphasized the site‑specific nature of the findings and cautioned that results depend on local soils, hydrology and management; he also outlined treatment and handling technologies that exist but noted many remain too costly or technically demanding for broad on‑farm adoption.

Committee members asked questions about techniques to reduce nutrient loads in slurry, the role of grazing in observed soil phosphorus patterns and the comparability of these findings to other Arkansas watersheds. Champlaier recommended continued monitoring and careful nutrient and grazing management on application fields.