Get email alerts on the Physician Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves 5% physician E&M raise now, asks DHS to return with additional plan
Summary
After an hours-long debate over data, actuary inputs and fiscal impact, the committee approved DHS's 5% increase to physician evaluation-and-management codes and adopted a motion asking DHS to return before January with consideration of the additional 3% recommended by stakeholders.
Get email alerts on the Physician Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate panel reviewed a DHS proposal to raise physician evaluation-and-management (E&M) reimbursement codes by 5% and debated whether to adopt a larger increase recommended by providers.
Janet Mann, director of medical services at DHS, told the committee the administration used a contracted actuary (Milliman) and internal staff analysis to develop the recommendations. "We proposed splitting it between the evaluation and management codes before you today," Mann said; she confirmed the 5% increase is scheduled to be effective July 1, with an additional 3% being considered for Jan. 1 as part of PCCM/PCMH program changes.
Committee members challenged DHS on the underlying survey and data. Representative Bentley pointed to a fiscal-impact figure in the exhibit showing a $4.5 million total cost with $3.2 million federal and $1.3 million state general-revenue impact and urged a larger increase. "This is where the rubber meets the road," Bentley said, pushing for an 8% increase.
Representative Bentley moved to defer review — effectively withholding approval — seeking a larger adjustment; Representative Wardlaw offered a substitute motion to review the rule as presented by DHS with the expectation DHS would return to the committee before year-end to pursue the additional recommended percentage. The substitute motion carried on a committee vote and the rule was recorded as reviewed; DHS said the 5% would take effect July 1 if the process proceeds toward adoption.
Lawmakers repeatedly asked DHS to provide more granular survey and cost data, access figures for rural areas, and breakdowns showing how much of E&M payments flow directly to independent physicians versus employed providers.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
