Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Withholding And Remote Work topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate debate stalls bill forcing out‑of‑state employers to withhold Arkansas income tax
Summary
House Bill 1039 would require out‑of‑state employers with employees who perform services in Arkansas to withhold Arkansas income tax for those employees. Senators raised concerns about reciprocity, remote work and temporary project workers; after extended debate the committee kept the bill on the calendar for further study.
House Bill 1039 was presented to the Senate Revenue & Tax Committee as a measure to require out‑of‑state employers whose employees perform services in Arkansas to deduct and withhold Arkansas income tax for those employees.
Paul Gehring of the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) said the bill seeks to align withholding obligations so Arkansas residents who work in the state for out‑of‑state employers can have state income tax withheld at the source rather than making quarterly estimated payments. "This is for people that are residing in the state of Arkansas," Gehring said, noting the change would let employees ask an out‑of‑state employer to commence withholding so they need not file quarterly estimates.
Senators pressed a range of concerns. Some members warned the bill addresses only half of a broader multistate withholding question — it covers Arkansas residents working in Arkansas for out‑of‑state employers but does not resolve how Arkansas should treat Arkansas‑based employers whose employees work from other states. Senator Johnson and others raised scenarios involving temporary nonresident workers on short‑term construction projects and asked whether withholding rules would unfairly burden employers or create reciprocal tax conflicts with other states.
Gehring responded that many states already impose similar withholding requirements and that the bill is intended to treat out‑of‑state employers the same as in‑state employers when they pay Arkansas residents who perform services within Arkansas. He also said DFA has issued guidance and legal opinions in related areas and that clarifying statutes to reflect remote‑work realities may require a broader policy discussion.
After extended questioning and concerns about interstate consequences and administration, the committee voted to keep House Bill 1039 on the calendar for further study rather than advancing it that day.
What happens next: The bill is held for additional committee consideration and broader policy review of multistate withholding and remote‑work taxation issues.
