Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator proposes mandatory abortion‑complication reporting; medical students oppose as a burdensome TRAP‑style requirement
Summary
Senate Bill 3 would require facilities and clinicians to report abortion complications to the Department of Health within three business days and publish an annual report; the bill drew questions about implementation costs and opposition from medical students who said it imposes unnecessary burdens and risks stigmatizing providers.
Senate Bill 3, introduced by Senator Greg Garner before the Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee, would require physicians or facilities to report abortion complications to the Department of Health within three business days. Garner said required data would include the date and type of abortion, age of the fetus, date and description of the complication, patient year of birth, race, marital status, state and county of residence, number of live births and number of prior abortions; the bill would not require provider or patient names to comply with HIPAA protections.
Garner told the committee the measure is intended to protect women’s health by compiling data on complications so the state can publish an annual report to inform policy and oversight. He said the bill would capture a range of serious outcomes—shock, sepsis, hemorrhage—and obligate electronic submission by facilities as well as clinicians.
Committee members asked whether other medical procedures already have compulsory complication reporting and about the fiscal and operational impact on the Department of Health. Laura Shue, general counsel for the Department of Health, told the committee there would be a fiscal impact—staff time to monitor and process reports—and agreed to provide a formal fiscal statement if requested.
Opponents included a delegation of fourth‑year medical students who submitted a written statement and spoke in person. Alexandra Bader, reading the students’ letter, called SB3 a targeted regulation of abortion providers (a TRAP‑style law) that would impose medically unnecessary reporting requirements and could discourage evidence‑based practice and new physicians from working in Arkansas. The students cited CDC data that abortion safety exceeds 99 percent and urged a no vote.
Committee members did not vote on SB3 during the hearing; several senators requested a fiscal impact estimate and additional follow‑up before proceeding.
