Patrick Morrison, director-level staff for the division, told the Utah Outdoor Adventure Commission on Oct. 1 that the Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) has attracted heavy interest from local councils and other partners, with more than $80,000,000 in funding requests and a total project cost universe of roughly $334,000,000.

The update said ranking councils composed of association staff and local elected appointees have been reviewing project presentations and that commissioners will be asked to approve final rankings when the commission meets on Nov. 19. Morrison said the division expects to present how much money is being requested, how much is available, and the ranking results ahead of that meeting so commissioners can do background review.

Why it matters: commissioners will be asked next month to distribute limited ORI funds against a large pipeline of proposals. Division staff said roughly $22,000,000 is likely available to allocate from the program in the coming round, making the ranking process consequential for which local projects receive state support.

Commissioners used the update to open a separate conversation about long‑range recreation planning. A staff presenter asked whether the commission would endorse piloting multi‑year regional planning — a shift from the current emphasis on near‑term projects and backlog maintenance. The presenter described a pilot that could fund community needs assessments, asset inventories and public engagement, and suggested costs could range from modest outreach contracts to a larger consulting engagement depending on scope.

Commissioners cautioned that a long‑range approach should not ignore pressing maintenance needs. One commissioner asked how to balance backlog maintenance with strategic planning; staff replied that a pilot could include a needs assessment to identify priorities that bridge both maintenance and strategic projects. Another commissioner said the regional councils could help ground a long‑range plan in local needs and existing capacity.

Staff said the division will provide commissioners with project lists and funding amounts in advance of the Nov. 19 meeting and urged commissioners to review materials when distributed so the final rankings vote can reflect informed priorities.