Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
EDA convenes closed session under Minnesota Statute 13D.3(c) to discuss real‑estate offers
Summary
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D subsection 3(c), the EDA entered a closed meeting to develop and consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase/sale of real property and read several Parcel Identification Numbers (PIDs). The board later reconvened and adjourned.
The Dayton EDA cited Minnesota Statute 13D subsection 3(c) to go into a closed session to "develop and consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase, sale of real estate personal property," and read multiple Parcel Identification Numbers that were to be discussed in closed session. Staff paused the public audio to begin the closed session; the board later reconvened in open session and adjourned.
The PIDs read into the record for the closed session were provided by staff and included a series of internal parcel numbers the EDA said would be discussed under the statute. The meeting record shows the EDA entered and later exited the closed session; no public vote on the subject matter was recorded in the open meeting minutes.
Because the matter was discussed in closed session under the statutory exemption, details of offers and negotiations were not disclosed in the public transcript.
