Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wilson County authorizes department-level evaluation of Enterprise fleet program
Summary
After a detailed presentation by Enterprise Fleet Management, Wilson County commissioners voted to authorize county staff to work with Enterprise to evaluate department-by-department vehicle leasing and replacement options and return budget estimates by July 22.
Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wilson County Commissioners Court voted July 8 to authorize county staff to continue department-level work with Enterprise Fleet Management to develop vehicle-replacement and leasing options for county departments.
County Auditor Brenda Trevino introduced the program and said the purpose of the review is fact-finding and budgeting, not to approve a lease or contract. An Enterprise representative told the court the company analyzed 47 vehicles in the sheriff’s fleet and proposed shortening the replacement cycle from about nine years to roughly 4.4 years. “In this 10 year snapshot here, the 10 year savings would be $469,000 to the county over the next 10 years,” the Enterprise presenter said, citing reduced maintenance and improved resale timing for newer vehicles.
Enterprise detailed assumptions the analysis used: an average current fleet budget near $633,000 for the sheriff’s unit, maintenance averages of about $232 per vehicle per month, and fuel costs in the neighborhood of $198,000. The presenter said transitioning would increase first-year lease payments (an example figure of about $403,000 was given) and produce sale proceeds from existing vehicles (example: about $233,000), with net savings realized over the replacement cycle because maintenance and fuel costs would decline.
Commissioners pressed Enterprise on specifics: whether aftermarket outfitting for law-enforcement vehicles would be included (Enterprise said outfitting costs can be built into the lease schedule and that local vendors could be used), who holds title during lease (Enterprise said vehicles remain on Enterprise title during the lease, with the county retaining equity created by resale under an open-ended/finance-style residual), and how accidents or total losses would be handled (Enterprise said the county would carry its usual insurance and Enterprise’s loss division would work with the county’s carrier as needed).
Enterprise also described a maintenance-management program with local approved vendors and AEC-certified technicians, driver training offerings, and dedicated county account managers to support replacements and urgent needs. Commissioners asked for a list of local vendors and for Enterprise to coordinate with existing county vendors where feasible.
Judge and county staff said the next step is a department-by-department evaluation so the county can produce budget numbers by July 22. Commissioner King moved to authorize staff to proceed with the fact-finding and departmental reviews, Commissioner Aiken seconded, and the court voted to approve the evaluation. No lease agreement or contract was signed; staff emphasized any later contract would return to court for approval.
The court’s authorization is limited to further evaluation and budgeting; any decision to adopt a countywide fleet-management contract remains subject to future review, procurement checks and formal contract approval.

