Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission signals major rewrite of 1980 subdivision rules after legal review
Summary
A legal review found Rutland Town's subdivision ordinance (1980) out of step with state law and potentially overreaching into zoning; the commission plans multiple subcommittee meetings to align references, remove impermissible provisions and produce a defensible draft for Select Board review.
Speaker 4, a Planning Commission member who summarized legal counsel Kevin Brown's review, said the town's subdivision ordinance dates from 1980 and does not fully comply with changes made at the state level in 2003. "Our existing subdivision ordinance was enacted in 1980," Speaker 4 said, and Kevin's summary identified numerous references that are outdated or that risk exceeding the commission's statutory authority.
Speaker 4 explained the legal context, including the Dillon rule and limits on municipal authority: "We only have the authority guaranteed granted by the legislatures," and when subdivision regulations stray into matters of zoning the town may lack authority to enforce those provisions. Commission members agreed that ambiguous language would be construed in favor of property owners, increasing legal exposure.
The commission described a process to correct the draft: conduct at least three more subcommittee meetings to work through Kevin's comments (starting by finishing section 1, then proceeding through sections 3 and 4, with section 2 reserved for concentrated review). Speakers urged separating statutory mandatory items (direct "tells") from discretionary choices so the Select Board can be briefed and the commission can seek model bylaws or examples Kevin might recommend.
Speakers noted practical drafting challenges: broken or obsolete statutory citations in the existing materials, the need to blend Kevin's format with the town's current ordinance format, and the likelihood the rewrite will be labor intensive. The commission agreed to continue subcommittee work and report progress at the next meetings.
