Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flood Risk River Corridor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planners review river corridor slides, stress 'no adverse impact downstream' amid recent floods
Summary
The planning commission received a slide presentation on river corridors and flood risk, with presenters citing recent flooding in Ludlow and other towns and emphasizing the objective of avoiding adverse downstream impacts; commissioners discussed presenting a shortened slide deck at a Town Life event.
The Rutland Town Planning Commission on Aug. 22 heard a presentation on river corridors and flood risk that drew on recent local flood events and state river-evolution data. The presenter emphasized the guiding objective of avoiding "adverse impact downstream" when considering development near flood-prone corridors.
Slides showed photo examples from Ludlow, Okemo, Cuttingsville and Stockbridge and included graphics explaining river corridor width, channel meandering and how constrained channels can accelerate erosion and damage infrastructure. A presenter described recent events: "...Cavendish and Ludlow were underwater, and it was really, really a mess," and later noted how beaver-pond failures and cloudbursts can dramatically change upstream conditions and send large volumes of water downstream.
Commissioners and attendees discussed how to present the material in public outreach. They recommended shortening the slide deck for the upcoming Town Life event to about 10 minutes, favoring striking photographs over technical topography charts to keep public attention. The presenter and commissioners also reviewed ERAF (education revenue adjustment framework) illustrations used in the slides that show how municipal shares could be affected under a hypothetical $1,000,000 in damage scenarios and discussed the relationship between river corridors and NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program) membership.
The presentation included technical notes about channel stability stages and a recommendation to keep structures outside the active corridor to reduce erosion and infrastructure risk. Commissioners agreed to include selected slides and photographs at public outreach events and to continue ordinance-review work related to river corridors and streets/sidewalks at the September meeting.
