Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lavaca County names Joanne Reeves part‑time veteran service officer

Lavaca County Commissioners Court · August 12, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lavaca County Commissioners Court appointed Joanne Reeves as a part‑time veteran service officer to serve Lavaca and Colorado counties, placing her office in an ADA‑accessible annex; the motion passed by voice vote.

Joanne Reeves was appointed on Aug. 12, 2024, as Lavaca County’s part‑time veteran service officer after the Commissioners Court accepted the recommendation of an ad hoc selection committee.

Steven Greenwell, chair of the veteran service officer committee, introduced Reeves and described the selection as unanimous among several qualified applicants. Greenwell said he had observed Reeves’ work ethic and compassion through shared VFW chapter activity: "I am confident that the committee made the right decision, and I am further confident that she will faithfully serve those who served us." Reeves told the court it was "an honor to serve again with my family out there and the county of Lavaca."

The court approved appointing Reeves by a motion from Precinct 2 and a second from Precinct 1; commissioners voiced their approval and the motion passed. Commissioners said Reeves will serve Lavaca County and Colorado County as a part‑time employee, with an office placed on the annex’s first floor to ensure ADA accessibility.

The judge invited veterans attending the meeting to join for a group photo following the appointment. The court did not set additional budget details for the position during the meeting; staff follow‑up and office setup were discussed informally.

The appointment is effective immediately per the court’s vote; the court did not record a formal hiring contract during this session.