Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board presses district for details after proposal to host intensive outpatient mental-health services

Sheboygan Area School District Board of Education · December 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members raised confidentiality, licensure and liability concerns about a proposal to offer intensive outpatient (IOP) mental-health services linked to a partnership with Rogers Behavioral Health, and asked staff for more specifics before pursuing school-based placements.

Board members asked the district to provide more detail before pursuing any in-school intensive outpatient (IOP) mental-health program after a district long-range plan update described exploring such partnerships.

At the meeting several board members said a high school should not function as a behavioral-health clinic. One board member said, "South High School is not a behavioral health site and nor should it be," and warned of risks if a student in crisis moved through campus. Another board member raised questions about confidentiality and parental engagement for higher levels of care.

District staff told the board that the partnership with Rogers Behavioral Health is not finalized and that any arrangement would include memoranda of understanding and confidentiality agreements. A district administrator said there would typically be an intake process, a release-of-information form for parents, and that placement decisions would proceed through individualized education program (IEP) teams.

Staff framed the concept as a bridge back to school for students who had received off-site support, not a replacement for licensed behavioral-health facilities. The district also said it is exploring community-site options rather than locating a licensed IOP unit directly inside a general high school classroom.

Board members pressed for follow-up information on licensing, liability, security protocols, parent notifications and cost or contract terms; staff invited board members to submit written questions and requested a meeting that would include Rogers. The board did not vote on a policy or contract at the meeting.

Next steps: district staff committed to provide written responses to the board’s concerns and to arrange further conversations that include the potential community partner.