Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission delays decision on certified local government status to allow more review of aesthetics, parking and lot‑coverage impacts
Summary
The commission agreed to table a historic landmark commission recommendation that would pursue certified local government (CLG) status so staff can return with detailed pros, cons and draft code changes addressing parking, lot coverage, ADUs and drainage.
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Bastrop Planning & Zoning Commission on Sept. 26 chose to table a recommendation from the Historic Landmark Commission that would move the city toward certified local government (CLG) status — a designation that can allow local regulation of certain aesthetic standards.
Sylvia, a city staff presenter, told commissioners the historic commission wants the city to pursue certification because local authority over aesthetics is the only way the city can regulate building materials, facades and similar design elements. She warned, however, that local aesthetic regulation can be intrusive and has property‑rights implications: “We are a very strong property right state. However, regulating aesthetics is a pretty big thing in an area.”
Staff identified three primary policy drivers to review: parking requirements and spillover onto neighborhood streets; high lot coverage and impervious surface (staff cited figures of 70–80% in some districts); and the number of additional dwelling units allowed on a lot, which can increase density. Staff said these topics require detailed discussion and recommended returning with draft code language and outreach before forwarding to council.
Commissioners asked for examples and a timeline. Staff said they would return with a fuller memo, draft language and outreach plans and suggested the item be scheduled for further consideration in November. A motion to table the CLG recommendation until the next regular meeting was made and seconded; commissioners agreed to delay further action.
Staff emphasized the interplay with the comprehensive plan review and noted further public workshops and outreach would follow if the commission wishes to proceed. The commission did not make a substantive determination on certified local government status at this meeting.

