Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee forwards two small‑lot rezones to county board; voice votes approve recommendations
Summary
The committee recommended two rezoning requests to the county board — a roughly 5‑acre split and a 6.36‑acre split — approving both by voice vote and discussing the county's 35‑acre forestry zoning threshold and when rezoning is required.
The Richland County Zoning and Land Conservation Committee voted to recommend two rezone requests to the county board: a 5‑acre split to separate farm buildings and a 6.36‑acre split that likewise removes house and buildings from cropland.
Staff described both requests as splits that preserve the larger parcels' agricultural use. "We sent out the packet or letter to all their surrounding neighbors; we heard from one neighbor on this," a zoning staff member said of the 5‑acre case. For the second request staff confirmed no neighbors contacted the office.
Committee members questioned whether the remaining parcels met the county's 35‑acre threshold for forestry/ag zoning often required under state guidance. The county surveyor and planning staff explained the county practice: if the remainder remains in the same agricultural use, a formal rezoning typically is not required, but the committee agreed to place review of ordinance wording on a future agenda to clarify the 35‑acre standard.
Both rezone recommendations were approved by voice vote with no recorded roll‑call tallies and will proceed to the county board for final action.
Actions recorded at the meeting include the committee's motion and voice approval to forward each rezone to the county board.
