Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board flags unclear language in native landscaping ordinance, schedules workshop

Sustainability Advisory Board, Oshkosh City · July 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members told staff the native landscaping areas ordinance is ambiguous about borders, the three-year transition and an 8-inch height rule; the board agreed to hold a workshop next month to rewrite language and clarify exemption procedures.

The Sustainability Advisory Board reviewed the City of Oshkosh "native landscaping areas" ordinance on July 1 and identified multiple points needing clearer language and administrative guidance.

Emma (staff) and other members noted one recent private submission that will proceed to parks for review under existing approval steps, but board members repeatedly raised questions about definitions and enforcement. A recurring concern was a provision that limits the transition to natives to "no longer than 3 growing seasons," which members said is unclear and possibly onerous. One member said, "I don't know why we even put a time limit on it," and others suggested the city allow extensions where appropriate.

The ordinance also includes an 8-inch threshold that the board said could classify intentionally managed native plantings as weeds if not clearly exempted. Members asked whether plantings inside defined beds or bordered areas should automatically qualify for a native landscaping designation; several said the ordinance does not explicitly require borders but leaves ambiguity for enforcement officers and residents.

Board members recommended drafting clearer criteria that define when a planting constitutes a 'native landscaping area' (for example, parameters for beds, edging/borders and management expectations) and clarifying the approval and inspection process. The board voted to place the ordinance on the next meeting as a workshop item to propose edits and asked staff to prepare suggested language changes and examples for the workshop.

No formal ordinance change was adopted at the July 1 meeting; the board postponed revisions to a dedicated workshop to ensure clearer standards for residents and enforcement staff.