Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Controversy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident accuses councilor of 'weaponizing' police; council and town manager outline enforcement processes

East Greenwich Town Council · October 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment, Michael McQuaid accused Councilor Reina Engelhart of posting about him online, 'weaponizing' the police and harassing his father; councilors and the town manager described how alleged animal‑abuse and housing violations are investigated and handled by the police and building officials.

During the public‑comment period a resident, Michael McQuaid of 50 Downing Street, told the council he had lived in East Greenwich for 30 years and accused Councilor Reina Engelhart of posting about him on an online group and “weaponizing the town police department” against him. McQuaid alleged the councilor had harassed his father at his work and slandered him in online posts, and he called for Engelhart’s resignation.

A councilor responded that some neighbors had contacted police with complaints about Mr. McQuaid and described prior enforcement issues such as a persistent dumpster and high grass. Town Manager Andrew Nada outlined procedural steps for complaints: initial intake by the police department (including the applicable division) and, if substantiated, follow‑up through municipal court or other enforcement channels; housing‑code matters would go to the building‑officials office. Nada said some matters have been addressed over time, others may still be ongoing, and the town generally provides residents a period to remedy issues before escalation.

The allegation against a named councilor was made in public comment and was not investigated or resolved during the meeting. Councilors noted they rely on law‑enforcement and building‑department processes to evaluate and, when necessary, pursue legal action.

The council did not take any formal disciplinary action during the meeting; the accusation remained unresolved in the public record and would require separate investigatory steps or formal complaints to yield findings.