Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Medford council votes to send home rule petition requiring institutional master plans to legislature
Summary
Council voted unanimously to transmit a home rule petition asking the state legislature to authorize Medford to require institutional master plans from large institutions (hospitals, colleges, non‑profit educational corporations).
The Medford City Council voted Feb. 25 to transmit a home rule petition to the Massachusetts General Court that would allow the city to require institutional master plans from large institutions such as hospitals and colleges.
Vice President Collins, who moved the measure, said the authority would give the city greater ability to collaborate and plan with large campuses that have substantial land holdings. “Such a measure ... would give us the greater latitude and authority that I think we all know that we need and deserve over the very large institutions that take up a lot of real estate and take up a lot of land,” Collins said during debate.
Supporters argued the petition would level the planning playing field between municipalities and institutions with large footprints; opponents did not prevail in council debate. Public commenter Matthew Page urged stronger administration engagement in legislative testimony and resident outreach, saying previous bills had stalled and the city should better prepare testimony and involve residents.
On a motion by Vice President Collins, seconded by Councilor Sang, the council voted to submit the home rule petition to the legislature. The petition, if enacted by the General Court and signed into law, would authorize Medford to require institutional master plans subject to municipal review and approval.
