Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments LGBTQ topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and health professionals urge RSU 40 board to avoid anti‑trans rhetoric; speakers cite Title IX and public health research
Summary
Three public commenters urged the RSU 40 board to stop airing anti‑trans commentary, argued that such rhetoric harms students, and cited Title IX and a recent study linking anti‑trans legislation to suicidality.
Three members of the public used the board’s audience time to press the RSU 40 board on comments and materials used at prior meetings about transgender students.
Tori Barrell, who identified herself as a parent of three district students, said she expected the district to educate children “in alignment with the RSU 40 vision,” and criticized board members’ prior remarks about transgender students. Barrell said the speech at the last board meeting used what she described as conservative talking points presented as research and asserted, “From the mouths of board members, we have heard that parents of transgender children are abusive…giving transgender students rights takes away rights from others.” She told the board that continuing such rhetoric risks the district’s staff recruitment and retention.
Amy Smith of Waldenborough said continuing to “publicly air anti transgender commentary is potentially harmful to our students” and urged the board to seek resources to better appraise evidence and research, rather than relying on secondary sources with political bias. Smith recommended training on how to evaluate primary and secondary sources before citing them at public meetings.
Rachel, who identified herself as the author of an email discussed at a prior meeting, summarized a recently published study she said was “the first to demonstrate a causal relationship between anti‑trans legislation and suicidality.” She contrasted material from the American College of Pediatricians (which she described as a small, partisan group) with the American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2018 and 2023 policy statements supporting care and support for transgender and gender‑diverse children. Rachel urged the board to focus on student well‑being and evidence‑based guidance.
Board members did not make a formal response on the record during audience time. The board’s public‑comment rules (policy BEDH and policy AC) were read aloud before the comments, including a requirement that handouts be left on the table and that complaints requiring further research be referred to the superintendent.
