Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Extended public comment at Chippewa Valley Schools centers on curriculum, books and academic performance
Summary
Multiple public commenters urged the board to adopt policies limiting classroom instruction on CRT and LGBTQ issues, called for stronger Constitution Day observances, and criticized district academic outcomes and legal spending; the board did not take any immediate new policy votes.
The Sept. 9 Chippewa Valley Schools board meeting included an extended public‑comment period in which several speakers pressed the board on curriculum, library materials and district academic performance.
Melody Kern told the board she wants proactive policies "that state how far a staff member can go to teach CRT or LGBTQ ideologies" and asked for parent opt‑out mechanisms for content they find objectionable. "Be proactive," she said, urging the board to adopt clearer directives.
Louis Miles asked the board to recognize Patriot Week and Constitution Day in district schools, citing "Public Law 108‑447" and requesting a presentation at the next meeting on how each school will observe Constitution Day. Miles also questioned the speed of the recent hire for the new auxiliary services role and asked for salary information.
Other speakers raised concerns about district academic results and spending. A commenter identified as David presented materials he said show M‑STEP proficiency for 11th grade at roughly 40% and said the district budget has grown substantially over a decade; he urged the board to explain the results given the district’s spending level. Amelia criticized board meeting rules and pointed to about $100,000 in legal spending defending a case she said stemmed from a small damages claim. Fred Neenstead and other commenters argued the district should emphasize Constitution Week and counter what they described as "moral degenerative teaching." Several speakers urged the board to listen and to make policy changes.
Board members did not vote on new curriculum or library policies at the meeting; instead the board heard comments and offered brief replies thanking speakers and noting they will consider community input.
Why it matters: The public‑comment thread surfaces persistent community disputes over curriculum content, board transparency, academic outcomes and district legal costs. Those arguments are likely to reappear on future agendas and could lead to formal policy proposals or committee work.
