Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government Operations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Carlisle County Fiscal Court adopts FY24-25 budget, approves MOU and multiple routine motions

Carlisle County Fiscal Court · June 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its regular meeting, the Carlisle County Fiscal Court adopted the FY24-25 budget following a public hearing and approved a memorandum of understanding with Kentucky State Police for CAD sharing, insurance coverage for the year, several tax settlements and a series of administrative items by voice votes.

The Carlisle County Fiscal Court adopted its fiscal year 24-25 budget after a public hearing and second reading; the court approved the measure by voice vote, setting county spending for the coming year.

In the same session, the court approved a memorandum of understanding with the Kentucky State Police to exchange selected computer-aided dispatch (CAD) entries between agencies, voted to purchase county insurance for the year, and accepted three 2025 grant-funded improvements for the 911 system. County officials also approved multiple routine financial settlements and transfers, including a 23 tax settlement, a 'far dues' tax settlement, a franchise tax settlement, and the quarterly final settlement.

Other administrative approvals included acknowledgment of the monthly county reports and acceptance of the county property-loss report; motion to acknowledge several volunteer fire department budgets and rosters; approval of sheriff state aid; setting maximum salaries for county employees for 2025; and ratification of updates to the county administrative code (which added a director position and clarified holiday pay). The court moved and approved paying county claims and bills during the meeting.

Most votes were taken by voice; the court recorded motions, seconds and carried outcomes without roll-call tallies in the transcript. The court also scheduled a revised meeting date and authorized staff to prepare a sample medical-marijuana ballot resolution for a future meeting.