Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mallory Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glynn County Island Planning Commission defers design review for Mallory Street project pending conditional-use application
Summary
The commission deferred a Village Preservation design review for partial demolition and housing above Blue Water Grill at 115–121 Mallory Street until the applicant submits a conditional-use permit; neighbors raised parking, loading and fire-access concerns.
The Glynn County Island Planning Commission on Jan. 18 paused action on a design review for partial demolition at 115 and 121 Mallory Street and for proposed second-floor residential units, asking the applicant to return with a conditional-use permit (CUP) and a consolidated package.
Staff described the application as a Village Preservation design review that would demolish a non-historic rear addition to create parking and add three residential units above the storefront. Architect Charles Day told the commission he had submitted updated drawings to the county portal on Aug. 13 but that not all revised plans had been included in the meeting packet. "I have submitted updated drawings for the apartment on 121 Mallory Street, in the portal and also in the email correspondence," Day said.
Neighbors and business owners told the commission they had not all seen the revised plans and raised persistent concerns about parking, large delivery vehicles using narrow alleys, staging for construction and emergency access. A neighbor asked the commission to "place a restricted covenant on the buildings to not allow commercial traffic or deliveries on Floyd Street," citing long idling by large trucks. The property manager for nearby Tommy’s store warned the three units and their guests would likely park in front of adjacent retail, worsening an already tight supply.
Commissioners debated the sequencing of approvals, with several members saying conditional-use review for second-floor housing should settle questions about parking, access and staging before or alongside design approval. Staff and the commission noted county parking rules are met on paper (the applicant proposes eight off-Floyd spaces) but that practical access and staging remained unresolved. The applicant said there is no direct connection from the proposed parking lot to the rear alley; residents would access some units via a walk around to Butler and down the alley.
After discussion and public comment, a commissioner moved to defer consideration of the design review; another amendment tied the deferral to submission of the conditional-use permit so the commission could consider a full package. The commission agreed to revisit the project once the CUP and related site materials are submitted and publicly noticed.
Next steps: the applicant is expected to submit a conditional-use application and a consolidated site package; the commission will re-notice a hearing when those materials are available.
