Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trees And Str Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Simons tree-canopy changes and short-term rental parking rules prompt concerns at Glynn County work session
Summary
Commissioners and residents pressed staff on a proposed St. Simons tree‑canopy standard (cutting 12 to 8 trees per acre), new parking requirements tied to bedroom counts, and whether existing short-term rentals would be grandfathered.
At a joint Mainland and Island planning commission work session, commissioners and residents raised concerns about two island-focused topics in Glynn County’s working draft: a change to St. Simons Island’s tree‑canopy requirements and new parking standards for larger homes and short‑term rentals.
Tree-canopy proposal: Planning manager Stephanie Leith told the commission the draft would reduce the tree requirement in the St. Simons Tree Canopy Preservation Ordinance from 12 trees per acre to 8 and expand the rule’s triggers so more single‑family homes could be covered. Commissioners asked whether the measure would apply only to new construction or also to already‑platted lots; staff said it applies to new building permits and that new replacement trees would be a minimum 2‑inch caliper. One attendee cautioned that late builders in existing subdivisions could face added costs that earlier builders avoided.
Parking and short-term rentals: The working draft links required parking to bedrooms. Leith read the formula for the working draft: "4 bedrooms are larger, 2 spaces per dwelling plus 1 for each bedroom over 4," which yields four required spaces for a six‑bedroom unit. Commissioners debated whether stacking and long driveways could reasonably meet the requirement, how on‑street parking factors into enforcement and whether existing short‑term rental certificates should be grandfathered if they no longer meet new standards.
Grandfathering and practical impacts: Several commissioners argued existing property owners who obtained short‑term rental certificates and loaned against them could be unfairly penalized by new parking or site‑coverage rules. One commissioner suggested grandfathering current certificate holders or reviewing exemptions case‑by‑case. Staff said they expect to discuss grandfathering further and flagged it for follow‑up.
What remains unresolved: The meeting produced no formal decisions. Commissioners placed questions about automatic lot mergers, mitigation ratios for replacing very large oaks, and grandfathering of STR holders on the sticky‑note list for future discussion. Staff said legal and technical reviewers will take these issues into account in the next draft.
