Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Glynn County board approves 0‑foot rear setback but denies pool‑equipment encroachment for St. Simons home

Glynn County Board of Appeals · December 12, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Glynn County Board of Appeals approved a variance to legalize an existing 0‑foot rear (lot‑line) encroachment at 1902 First Avenue but denied a separate request to place pool equipment 2 feet from the property line. Staff had recommended approving the 0‑foot setback and denying the pool‑equipment reduction.

The Glynn County Board of Appeals on [meeting date] approved a variance to legalize an existing 0‑foot rear setback at 1902 First Avenue on St. Simons Island but denied a separate request to allow proposed pool equipment 2 feet from the property line.

Carol of Glynn County planning and zoning told the board that staff recommended approval of the 0‑foot rear setback for the existing structure but did not recommend approval of the setback reduction to 2 feet for the proposed pool equipment. Staff noted the property is in an R‑6, single‑family residential district where the normal rear setback is 7 feet and said the pool‑equipment pad was proposed at 10 feet by 4 feet.

The owner and applicant, Matthew Abraham, told the board his yard is small and that ‘‘there's nowhere else to put it in the yard’’ and that the family would prefer the pool equipment be located on the side of the house. He said the planned splash pool is likely to be about 18 by 12 feet.

Board members questioned whether the alley behind the property had been officially abandoned (staff said it had not) and repeatedly asked for a stamped, professional survey showing definitive measurements. Multiple board members said alternative placements for mechanical equipment appeared possible on the site plan and that pool equipment running during the day could cause noise impacts if placed near a bedroom window.

After discussion, Member (S4) moved to approve the 0‑foot rear setback for the existing encroachment but to deny the requested 2‑foot setback for the pool equipment; the motion was seconded and the board adopted the motion. Chair (S1) told the applicant he may appeal the denial of the pool‑equipment setback to the Glynn County Board of Commissioners.

Key details: the variance request combined two elements — legalizing an existing encroaching carport/structure at a 0‑foot lot line (staff recommended approval) and a proposed mechanical pad for pool equipment at 2 feet from the property line (staff recommended denial). The board approved legalization of the existing encroachment and denied the pool‑equipment setback reduction. The applicant did not provide a stamped survey at the hearing.

The decision does not finalize placement of the pool itself; the board’s action eliminates the need for repeated administrative variances for future minor work tied to the existing encroachment but left the pool‑equipment request unresolved in the applicant’s favor. The applicant retains the right to appeal the pool‑equipment denial to the Glynn County Board of Commissioners.