Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents ask Needles planners to protect Pioneer Cemetery and riverfront open space during general plan update

City of Needles Planning Commission · February 1, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents urged the Planning Commission to reclassify Pioneer Cemetery and adjacent parcels as public/open space, raised concerns that the MND may not protect archaeological and historic resources, and proposed riverfront public-space uses and elevated solar on privately owned parcels.

During the City of Needles Planning Commission study session, several residents directly urged commissioners to protect local historic and riverfront sites that they said are not adequately safeguarded in the draft general plan and its mitigated negative declaration.

Ruth Messer Lopez, who identified herself in public comments, asked commissioners to rezone land adjacent to Pioneer Cemetery and the parcel at 417 F Street (also referenced as 1 Grandview) to Public Facilities so that a proposed museum could serve as a gateway to the cemetery. She told the commission the cemetery is turn-of-the-century (late 1800s) and emphasized its archaeological and cultural significance, saying, "You can't leave this under CEQA because it's there's gonna be impact to a national historic preservation national historic site." Messer Lopez asked staff and commissioners to treat the cemetery as eligible for stronger protection.

Honey Davis, who said she owns a roughly 500-foot strip of open land beginning at Airport Wash, presented a proposal for riverfront public space with amenities such as a tea house, bakery, elevated solar arrays and shaded charging for electric vehicles. Davis urged the commission to apply stringent environmental safeguards because the site is near the river and she emphasized conservation-minded uses.

City staff and the PlaceWorks consultant team responded that tribal consultation was performed and that the MND was distributed for the required 30-day review; consultants noted they received one substantive comment from San Bernardino County about flooding and had provided written responses. Staff and consultants said parcel-specific concerns raised by commenters can be addressed during the public hearing process and that the online parcel map shows current versus proposed designations for any owner to review. The consultants also advised that if substantive new evidence of archaeological or historic significance emerges, that could affect the environmental determination and trigger additional CEQA analysis.

Ending: Commissioners and staff encouraged residents to submit written comments and to use the parcel lookup tools ahead of upcoming hearings; no zoning changes were adopted at the study session and the commission scheduled further hearings where residents' concerns can be examined in greater detail.