Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Down Payment Assistance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plumas supervisors hear proposal for down-payment assistance pilot, table decision to Feb. 4
Summary
Staff and local nonprofit leaders proposed a $500,000 down-payment assistance pilot (seeded from PG&E settlement funds) to help workforce housing in fire-affected areas; supervisors debated funding priorities and administrative costs and voted to table the allocation until Feb. 4.
Plumas County staff and a local nonprofit presented a plan on Jan. 21 to seed a down-payment assistance program with $500,000 of PG&E settlement funds and to seek a matching contribution from the Dixie Fire Collaborative.
Roger Diefendorf, executive director of the Plumas County Community Development Corporation, described a model that would award about $50,000 per household (grant or second-lien structure) and emphasized stacking state, federal and local programs. Heidi Allstead of the Truckee Tahoe Workforce Housing Agency described comparable programs in her region and said layered assistance plus counseling and employer partnerships helped recruit and retain workforce housing in Truckee.
Staff said the proposal included $200,000 in startup/administration costs (two-year operating budget, credit counseling, application intake and program administration) and $800,000 in grants if matched—proponents said stacking additional sources (CalHome, GFSA and nonprofit matches) could increase the program's reach.
Several speakers urged quick action to relieve housing shortages and to prioritize residents and local contractors; others, including supervisors, cautioned that the board has not yet adopted a formal policy prioritizing settlement funds and asked staff to include any large discretionary allocations in the midyear budget workshop for review. Because the Dixie Fire Collaborative had not yet voted on a matching contribution, several supervisors moved to table the appropriation for two weeks so the collaborative could consider a match and the board could finalize priorities.
Motion and next steps: The board voted to table consideration of the $500,000 allocation until its Feb. 4 meeting so the Dixie Fire Collaborative can consider a match and staff can present prioritization and budget details at the midyear workshop. Supporters said they will return with more specific startup cost breakdowns and program rules defining applicant priority (local hires, sector priorities such as health or education, deed restrictions or loan terms).
