Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Presentations And Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presentations: SSD updates data systems, MTSS monitoring and curriculum; public commenters dispute financial messaging

Special School District St. Louis County Board of Education · February 25, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff updated the board on strategic-plan progress, CSIP and program-monitoring results (MTSS, counseling, student health services) and presented a recommended new name for the juvenile detention center school; public commenters disputed the district's budget messaging and cited audit language that said the district's financial position was strong.

District staff used the meeting to deliver three substantive presentations on strategic planning, continuous school improvement (CSIP) updates and program-monitoring results. Presenters described work on a data-warehouse contract, equity and family-engagement tools, Charting the LifeCourse integration with IEPs, and monitoring of MTSS, counseling and student health services.

Molly Bolton, identified in the meeting as chief of teaching, learning and accountability, said the district contracted with Authentica Seed Product to build a data-warehouse system and is pairing that work with analytics to deliver dashboards and a data dictionary to standardize terms across partner districts. Bolton described work on resource-distribution frameworks, improved communications and a pilot family survey whose results are under analysis.

An evaluation and research presenter summarized program-monitoring results. On MTSS, presenters said the most recent report cycle covered seven districts in the report with additional districts joining, and highlighted indicators for coaching access, existence of implementation plans and measures of student-level disproportionality in discipline; they noted a typographical correction to the report data. For the professional school counseling program, presenters said implementation measures have improved and some indicators are approaching target levels. For student health services, staffing—particularly the substitute nursing pool—and days students missed for one-on-one nursing because of shortages were noted as areas for improvement.

During presentations, board members asked how district partnerships and outcomes are tracked, how MTSS capacity is determined and whether the MTSS participation numbers could be compared across cycles given small samples. Staff said they will provide additional documentation (lists of participating districts and the underlying report data) and noted some districts decline support because they have other plans or use external consultants.

Public comments before the action-item votes focused on budget adjustments (agenda item 6.09) and labor/compensation history. An unidentified public commenter who referenced SDNEA materials read passages from an audit report, saying the audit described the district's net financial position as $74,600,000 and stated the district’s "financial position is strong," and urged the board to use full data rather than media narratives. David Hope, a second commenter, disputed district claims about the bargaining process and stated that interest-based bargaining (IBB) was used and mediated; he also said negotiated raises were blunted by attrition and that staff have lost purchasing power.

What’s next: Staff will provide requested lists and data to clarify MTSS participation and student mobility statistics. Branding and implementation steps for the newly named Summit Academy will proceed under Communications oversight, and the board’s approved budget adjustment moves forward under standard district financial procedures.