Presenter at county meeting urges Utah to leave ERIC, alleges data‑sharing and legal problems

Summary

At a public meeting, an unnamed presenter accused the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) of building voter profiles, outsourcing maintenance to partisan nonprofits, and violating federal and state statutes; the speaker urged Utah lawmakers and county officials to end participation and increase transparency.

An unidentified presenter at a county civic meeting on election administration urged Utah officials to leave the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), saying the interstate data‑sharing system creates privacy and legal risks and has been used to target voter outreach.

The presenter, credited in the transcript as Speaker 1, described ERIC as a nonprofit that matches states' voter‑registration rolls with DMV and other databases, and said Utah — a founding member — pays an initial $25,000 fee and population‑based annual dues (the presenter cited roughly $49,000 for Utah in the most recent year). "It is a nonprofit and nongovernmental agency," the presenter said, and "they want to build a profile of each voter in every state." The speaker added that Utah sends hashed driver and Social Security numbers to ERIC and that ERIC uses third‑party matching software to compare records across member states.

The presentation emphasized two types of concern. First, the speaker alleged procedural and legal problems: that ERIC's bylaws require member states only to "initiate contact" with certain flagged voters within 90 days rather than to perform roll cleaning; that ERIC prohibits public inspection of…

Presenter at county meeting urges Utah to leave ERIC, alleges data‑sharing and legal problems

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading