Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Trails Irrigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents tell council of trail e-bike near-miss and long-running irrigation water-share problems
Summary
During public comment, residents reported a near-miss with a fast electric bike on a walking path and raised a 20-year dispute over irrigation water shares and transition to culinary water; staff said state laws apply to e-bikes and that repairing the Highline Ditch could cost over $1 million and offered to follow up.
Two members of the public used the council’s public-comment period to raise separate local concerns.
An attendee described a near-miss on a walking path when a fast electric bike passed close behind and asked whether Springville has speed limits or other local rules for e-bikes. City staff responded that the city does not currently have a local ordinance but that recent state laws apply; the staff member said the police chief and lieutenants are looking at education and enforcement options and advised the resident to contact a staff point of contact (named 'John' in the meeting). Recreation staff member Stacy Child was noted as taking notes on the concern.
A second resident from 2610 Canyon Road described a multi-decade dispute over irrigation water shares. The speaker said they were given a certificate for two shares when they bought the property and recalled a prior city transition program that offered reduced-priced culinary water for a period. The resident said that converting to culinary water would be unaffordable for their acreage — estimating it would cost about $400 per month in summer — and described recent out-of-pocket repairs (about $150 each for new pipes) done by neighbors.
Council/staff answered that the long-term cost to repair and make the Highline Ditch usable could exceed $1 million, that a failure of the ditch could flood nearby residences, and that records and additional follow-up with staff would be made available to the resident (staff identified Brad Stapley and Troy as points of contact to clarify past agreements and records). Council offered to place the matter on a future work session agenda if needed.
The exchanges included practical follow-up steps rather than immediate policy decisions: staff asked the residents to provide contact information, said they would notify the police chief when he returned from travel, and offered to bring the topic to a future work session for more detailed discussion.
